Why Excesses Exist: Moral Hazard and the Economics of Risk Sharing
The concept of an insurance excess — known as a deductible in American terminology — is fundamentally a solution to an economic problem called moral hazard. Moral hazard occurs when a person who is insured against a risk behaves differently than they would if they bore the full cost of that risk. A homeowner with zero-excess contents insurance, for example, might be less careful about locking doors or securing valuables, knowing that any loss would be fully covered.
By requiring policyholders to bear a portion of every claim, excesses align the interests of the insurer and the insured. You retain a financial stake in preventing loss, which encourages prudent behaviour. Academic research in insurance economics consistently shows that higher excesses correlate with fewer small claims, which reduces administrative costs for insurers and, in turn, keeps premiums lower for everyone in the risk pool.
The second economic force at play is adverse selection. Without excesses, people who know they are likely to claim — perhaps because they live in a flood-prone area or drive in congested cities — would disproportionately buy insurance, driving up costs for the entire pool. Excesses act as a screening mechanism: policyholders who are confident they will rarely claim are willing to accept higher excesses in exchange for lower premiums, while those who expect to claim frequently prefer lower excesses even at a higher premium. This self-selection helps insurers price risk more accurately.
The Association of British Insurers (ABI) provides further reading on how risk-sharing works. Together, these mechanisms mean that excesses are not simply a way for insurers to avoid paying out — they are a structural feature that makes the entire insurance market function more efficiently.