Inside the 5–4 Vote: A Committee Divided
The February vote revealed a Monetary Policy Committee more deeply split than at any point since the current cutting cycle began in August 2024. Governor Andrew Bailey, Megan Greene, Clare Lombardelli, Catherine Mann, and Huw Pill voted to hold, while Breeden, Dhingra, Ramsden, and Taylor pushed for an immediate 25 basis-point reduction.
The most revealing shift came from Catherine Mann, who at various points in the past two years has occupied both the most hawkish and most dovish positions on the committee. Mann acknowledged that "the time for a cut in Bank Rate is closer" — a notable softening from her recent hawkish stance. Governor Bailey himself said he expects "quite a sharp drop in inflation over coming months" and sees "scope for some further easing of policy."
The committee's minutes paint a picture of genuine disagreement about the balance of risks. Those who voted to hold worry that services inflation and wage growth, while easing, remain above target-consistent levels. The dissenters point to an economy that is generating slack rapidly: unemployment has risen from 4.4% in late 2024 to 5.1% by November 2025, GDP growth remains below potential, and the Bank's own Agents' intelligence points to a subdued demand outlook. The minutes explicitly note that "most members put some weight on Bank staff analysis that had found little evidence of structural changes in wage bargaining" — effectively undermining one of the key hawkish arguments for holding.